In Google/Oracle case, Supreme Court will weigh software's future
Why it matters: The case lies at the heart of how modern softwaredevelopment works, and each side says a ruling in the other's favor will chill innovation.
Between the lines: When Google developed the Android smartphone operating system more than a decade ago, it tapped Java code that is now owned by Oracle so that Java programs could run.
Google and other allies hold that the industry has never operated that way, and restricting APIs will inhibit innovation and harm consumers.
Background: Oracle, which enjoys a good relationship with the Trump White House, has won backing from the Justice Department.
Of note: This is the first week the Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments since the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who had a record of defending intellectual property owners.
The White House despite its infinite access to the best resources available continues to respond to its own coronavirus outbreak about as recklessly as possible.
Why it matters: This botched response has jeopardized the health of the president and his staff, and it has set a very poor example in a country that's already done a terrible job handling the virus.
Space once the purview of only the wealthiest and most technologically advanced nations is now open to brands, private citizens and commercial companies, all at NASA's urging.
The big picture: The commercialization of spaceflight has flung open the door to branding and marketing in space that will change everyone's relationship with the cosmos.
We use cookies and analyse traffic to this site. By continuing to use this site, closing this banner, or clicking "I Agree", you agree to the use of cookies. Read our privacy poplicy for more information.